Study: My Understanding of

What you Need to Know About the Ruling on Campaign Finance Law

There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.

It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.

You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.

It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.